One of the greatest puzzlements of the 21st Century thus far is the continued support for the Democrat Party by over 90% of black-Americans. Without their vote, the Democrats could not get a candidate elected to the post of Director of Latrine Maintenance anywhere in America, and believe me the leadership of the DNC are well aware of this fact.
"Stockholm syndrome", the phenomenon in which victims display compassion for, and even loyalty to their captors was first widely recognized after the Swedish bank robbery that gave it its name. For six days in August 1973, thieves Jan-Erik Olsson and Clark Olofsson held four Stockholm bank employees hostage at gunpoint in a vault. When the victims were released, their reaction shocked the world: they hugged and kissed their captors, declaring their loyalty even as the kidnappers were carted off to jail.
Time and again during the 18 harrowing years Jaycee Lee Dugard allegedly spent in captivity, must have had the chance to cry for help but she assisted her alleged abductor, Phillip Garrido, with his home business, sorted out orders by phone or e-mail and occasionally greeted customers alone at the door. She even went out in public but she apparently never made a run for it, returning each day instead to a shed in the backyard of the man who allegedly kidnapped and raped her.
When San Francisco newspaper heiress Patty Hearst, daughter of Randolph Hearst, was abducted by the so called Symbionese Liberation Army (SLA) in 1974, she eventually and famously became their accomplice, adopting an assumed name and abetting the radical political group in at least one bank robbery.
A decade later, shortly after TWA Flight 847 took off from Athens in 1985, two gun-toting terrorists forced their way into the cockpit, demanding that the plane touch down in Lebanon. Once on the ground, they held passengers captive, threatened them with guns and murdered one hostage, dumping his body onto the tarmac. Nevertheless, after the captives were rescued, one of them reportedly said of his captors, "They weren't bad people; they let me eat, they let me sleep, they gave me my life."
Natascha Kampusch's story is perhaps even more troubling. The Austrian girl was abducted at age 10 and held for eight years in a windowless cellar by her abductor, Wolfgang Priklopil. She ran away in August 2006 yet upon learning that he had thrown himself in front of a train a few hours after she escaped, she reportedly burst into tears. "All I can say is that, bit by bit, I feel more sorry for him," Kampusch said in a 2007 documentary intended to mark her first year of freedom, calling Priklopil a "poor soul — lost and misguided."
As I observe the historical behavior of black Americans, I cannot escape the feeling that perhaps they have been (and continue to be) suffering from a hereditary form of this phenomenon (Stockholm Syndrome), that finds it's earliest precedent in the Exodus story of the Israelite's flight from Egyptian bondage, which is found in the Holy Bible:
Exodus 1: 11 So they put slave masters over them to oppress them with forced labor, and they built Pithom and Rameses as store cities for Pharaoh. 12 But the more they were oppressed, the more they multiplied and spread; so the Egyptians came to dread the Israelites 13 and worked them ruthlessly. 14 They made their lives bitter with hard labor in brick and mortar and with all kinds of work in the fields; in all their hard labor the Egyptians used them ruthlessly.
..........And yet when they were finally free.................
Numbers 11: 4...............the Israelites started wailing and said, "If only we had meat to eat! 5 We remember the fish we ate in Egypt at no cost—also the cucumbers, melons, leeks, onions and garlic. 6 But now we have lost our appetite; we never see anything but this manna!"
How else does one explain the historical support by black Americans of a Democrat Party that has for nearly 300 years, either enslaved them or, for the first five generations that followed emancipation, murdered and abused them in a virtually unrestrained manner. And furthermore, how does one explain their loyalty and the rush back into bondage to a Party which has habitually attempted to deny black Americans the freedoms that have been guaranteed unto them by a variety of guiding laws and principles, beginning with the specific language of the US Constitution.
Political Democrats dominated American politics for the first 85 years of the new republic, throughout the entire era of legal slavery. During that time, wealthy slaveholding families were predominantly supporting members of what president Andrew Jackson finally defined in 1828 as the Democrat Party.
History reveals that after the War of American Independence, which began in 1776, black American slaves continued to be held as personal property of white citizens of the fledging nation, unabated, until September 22, 1862 when newly elected president Abraham Lincoln issued the Emancipation Proclamation, freeing all slaves in America.
As slaves, black Americans obeyed their owners/masters in order to receive “fair“ treatment, and to avoid punishment that was sometimes severe. In return for their obedience, they were fed, clothed and given a place to sleep so as to keep them healthy, viable and able to work. In 1861, when Lincoln was elected and sent to Washington to lead the nation, he became the first Republican president of the United States. The emancipation action taken by Lincoln's administration was immediately objected to by indignant leaders of the Democrat Party, which emphatically supported slavery and which had continuously wielded power over the office of the president for the aforementioned 85 years prior to the election of Lincoln.
For the next 100 years, (1862-1962) whenever Democrats had control of the government, they persisted in their habitual efforts to keep black citizens segregated from the white population, to deny them the privilege of voting and to even to disallow equal access to public facilities. Worse, they were grievously abusive to them in heinous ways across the land, especially in the southern states where a secret and sinister organization known as the Ku Klux Clan perpetrated atrocity upon atrocity against black Americans whose only crime was being black and free.
In stark contrast, the historical record reflects that when Republicans controlled the government, efforts were made, or more likely diligently made to remove the restrictions and unconstitutional barriers to full citizenship for all races, and in particular for the descendents of the African slaves who had been freed by Lincoln and, in part, for whom the great American Civil War was fought.
Initially, many black Americans supported Republican politics, because of Lincoln's actions on their behalf. Then, Republican president, William Howard Taft (1909-1913), came along. Taft had publicly endorsed Booker T. Washington's program for the uplift of the black race, advising "now was the time for them to stay out of politics". Due to continued animosity between North and South politicians, however, he was reluctant to use federal authority to enforce the 15th amendment to the U.S. Constitution that allowed black Americans the right to vote. Disappointed by the lack of fervor by Taft, and encouraged by Woodrow Wilson's promises of support for their issues, in 1912, "an unprecedented number" of black Americans left the Republican Party to cast their vote for Democrat Wilson. However, they were disappointed when early in his administration he allowed the introduction of segregation into several federal departments and signed a bill making miscegenation (the mixing of different racial groups, that is, marrying, cohabiting, having sexual relations and having children with a partner from outside one's racially or ethnically defined group), a felony in the District of Columbia.. He also allowed DC streetcars to become segregated.
In the first half of the 20th Century, some of the earliest welfare programs were instituted and welfare agencies were notorious for racialized use of discretion. Noteworthy were programs such as State Mother's Pensions (1910-1930), which was designed to assist widowed mothers with children but excluded women of color, and The Social Security Act of 1935 (1930-1960), which was a broad national system of provision for the poor but specifically excluded domestic and agricultural workers who were predominantly black Americans.
By 1960, black American had become a significant voting block and during the 60s, specifically during the presidential terms of both John Kennedy and Lyndon Johnson, under severe pressure from the “civil rights movement“, the Democrat leadership capitulated to rights demands of black leaders such as Martin Luther King. What followed was a societal change which opened up significantly greater access to public assistance programs for black Americans, which allowed the Democrat Party to gain a firm control of the black vote by making them once again beholden to the same Democratic Party that physically enslaved them for 243 years (1619-1862) and physically and mentally abused them for 100 more (1862-1962)
Since the 60s, Democrats have intentionally drawn black Americans deeper and deeper into another, more sinister type of bondage by the use of such deceptive means as welfare, affirmative action and other racial quota and entitlement programs; By lowering educational standards they have given them the impression that they are progressing when in fact the majority are being pervasively and profoundly held back and rendered inadequate educationally to achieve whatever goals they may one day desire.
Democrat land owners may not still physically own black Americans for use on their plantations and as slaves in their homes, but they have managed to still own them psychologically, demanding that they serve the political purposes of the Democrat Party. In return, they are fed, clothed and given a place to sleep so as to keep them healthy, viable and able to work for the leaders of the Party. Even the first black president of the United States, it would appear, has been positioned through deception, trained and brought into the big house to serve the interests of his wealthy Democrat masters.
When will they set themselves free?
Wake up, black America........Wake up before it’s too late!!
Copyright 2010. All Rights Reserved.
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
When Will They Set Themselves Free?
Labels:
black American,
blogspot,
introspection,
racial,
slave,
slaveholder,
slavery
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

0 comments:
Post a Comment